Breaking the Bundle: Analyzing Duke’s Journal Subscriptions

Project Summary

A team of students partnering with Duke University Libraries will explore the complicated decision space of electronic journal licensing. Electronic resources like journal articles are a major service provided by academic libraries, but the choice of what journal subscriptions to purchase can be costly and time consuming, and journal distribution companies like Elsevier manipulate their journal bundles to maximize their own profits. This team will build a model for journal purchasing by combining several years of journal usage data (including view, downloads, authorship, citations, and impact) with journal cost data. The team will work on software to improve the data cleaning and analysis process and will create visualizations and dashboards to assist the library in its decision-making efforts. Because many libraries have the same concerns about journal bundles and use the same kinds of data to make these decisions, this project may have far-reaching impacts among academic libraries.

Faculty Leads: Angela Zoss, Jeff Kosokoff

Project Manager: Chi Liu

Themes and Categories
Year
2019
Contact
Paul Bendich
Mathematics
bendich@math.duke.edu

Related People

Related Projects

Social and environmental contexts are increasingly recognized as factors that impact health outcomes of patients. This team will have the opportunity to collaborate directly with clinicians and medical data in a real-world setting. They will examine the association between social determinants with risk prediction for hospital admissions, and to assess whether social determinants bias that risk in a systematic way. Applied methods will include machine learning, risk prediction, and assessment of bias. This Data+ project is sponsored by the Forge, Duke's center for actionable data science.

Project Leads: Shelly Rusincovitch, Ricardo Henao, Azalea Kim

Project Manager: Austin Talbot

Producing oil and gas in the North Sea, off the coast of the United Kingdom, requires a lease to extract resources from beneath the ocean floor and companies bid for those rights. This team will consult with professionals at ExxonMobil to understand why these leases are acquired and who benefits. This requires historical data on bid history to investigate what leads to an increase in the number of (a) leases acquired and (b) companies participating in auctions. The goal of this team is to create a well-structured dataset based on company bid history from the U.K. Oil and Gas Authority; data which will come from many different file structures and formats (tabular, pdf, etc.). The team will curate these data to create a single, tabular database of U.K. bid history and work programs.

Producing oil and gas in the Gulf of Mexico requires rights to extract these resources from beneath the ocean floor and companies bid into the market for those rights. The top bids are sometimes significantly larger than the next highest bids, but it’s not always clear why this differential exists and some companies seemingly overbid by large margins. This team will consult with professionals at ExxonMobil to curate and analyze historical bid data from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management that contains information on company bid history, infrastructure, wells, and seismic survey data as well as data from the companies themselves and geopolitical events. The stretch goal of the team will be to see if they can uncover the rationale behind historic bidding patterns. What do the highest bidders know that other bidders do not (if anything)? What characteristics might incentivize overbidding to minimize the risk of losing the right to produce (i.e. ambiguity aversion)?