Night Vision

Project Summary

Joel Tewksbury (BME) and Miriam Goldman (Math and Statistics, Arizona State University) spent ten weeks analyzing time-series darkness visual adaptation scores from over 1200 study participants to identify trends in night vision, and ultimately genetic markers that might confer a visual advantage.

Themes and Categories
Year
2016

Project Results

The team analyzed FrACT (Freiburg Visual Test) visual acuity and contrast data over time as subjects  adjusted to the dark in order to better understand healthy scotopic (night) vision. They found that speed of darkness adaptation appears to be highly variable, and that these data do not suggest speed of darkness adaptation relates to an individuals' final ability to see in the dark. The team did find a small number of genetic markers associated with improved night vision, which will be pursued further in future work by the study team.

Download the Executive Summary (PDF)

Article on Night Vision Team https://bassconnections.duke.edu/about/news/data-research-teams-focus-timing

Faculty Sponsor

Project Manager

Participants

  • Miriam Goldman, Arizona State University Statistics & Mathematics
  • Joel Tewksbury, Duke University Biomedical Engineering

Disciplines Involved

  • Pre-med
  • Biology
  • Biostatistics
  • All quantitative STEM

"I don't know if it's because I was on maternity leave for the first half or if they were just really good, but I felt like being involved took no effort on my part at all, and I got cool results without having to put much time in. It was a lot more fruitful than I had expected. Also it was fun to see the students learn scientific skills: they both told me they got an awful lot out of the program." Liz Cirulli, Assistant Research Professor in Molecular Genetics and Microbiology

Related People

Related Projects

Social and environmental contexts are increasingly recognized as factors that impact health outcomes of patients. This team will have the opportunity to collaborate directly with clinicians and medical data in a real-world setting. They will examine the association between social determinants with risk prediction for hospital admissions, and to assess whether social determinants bias that risk in a systematic way. Applied methods will include machine learning, risk prediction, and assessment of bias. This Data+ project is sponsored by the Forge, Duke's center for actionable data science.

Project Leads: Shelly Rusincovitch, Ricardo Henao, Azalea Kim

Project Manager: TBD

Producing oil and gas in the North Sea, off the coast of the United Kingdom, requires a lease to extract resources from beneath the ocean floor and companies bid for those rights. This team will consult with professionals at ExxonMobil to understand why these leases are acquired and who benefits. This requires historical data on bid history to investigate what leads to an increase in the number of (a) leases acquired and (b) companies participating in auctions. The goal of this team is to create a well-structured dataset based on company bid history from the U.K. Oil and Gas Authority; data which will come from many different file structures and formats (tabular, pdf, etc.). The team will curate these data to create a single, tabular database of U.K. bid history and work programs.

Producing oil and gas in the Gulf of Mexico requires rights to extract these resources from beneath the ocean floor and companies bid into the market for those rights. The top bids are sometimes significantly larger than the next highest bids, but it’s not always clear why this differential exists and some companies seemingly overbid by large margins. This team will consult with professionals at ExxonMobil to curate and analyze historical bid data from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management that contains information on company bid history, infrastructure, wells, and seismic survey data as well as data from the companies themselves and geopolitical events. The stretch goal of the team will be to see if they can uncover the rationale behind historic bidding patterns. What do the highest bidders know that other bidders to not (if anything)? What characteristics might incentivize overbidding to minimize the risk of losing the right to produce (i.e. ambiguity aversion)?